On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 15:46:56 +0200 Martin Steigerwald <mar...@lichtvoll.de> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 25. September 2014, 01:45:50 schrieb lee: > > Martin Steigerwald <mar...@lichtvoll.de> writes: > > > Am Montag, 22. September 2014, 23:50:46 schrieb lee: > > >> Martin Steigerwald <mar...@lichtvoll.de> writes: > > >> > > >> Do you really think they will be able to prevent all the other > > >> software from depending on a particular init system or parts of > > >> it? > > > > > > Well… thats to be taken upstream, isn´t it? > > > > Then why don't the developers or the distributions do just that? > > Nobody cares when one user or another questions whether it's a good > > idea to depend on systemd, and it might be much different if a lot > > of developers and/or whole distributions would, in the interest of > > their users, question this dependency and refuse their support > > eventually until the issues systemd and software depending on it > > brings about. > > […] > > Fedora does already depend on systemd --- and I would say > > completely. Or do you see a choice here? > > And exactly *how* is this relevant to Debian? Well, for one thing, it was one reason the DDs used to select systemd. SteveT Steve Litt * http://www.troubleshooters.com/ Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140925113444.23f63...@mydesq2.domain.cxm
