On Jo, 25 sep 14, 14:28:19, Hörmetjan Yiltiz wrote: > I hope you all can realize how much I do NOT want to open yet again another > issue on #NotSystemd topic.
No. > Seeing that the issue is still going on and on for almost from the moment > Debian decided to use systemd, and also considering the fact that the vote > was actually a tie, and it was decided by the ballot of the ruler. > > Debian wiki says this: > > Fedora, OpenSuSE, Arch and Mageia have already made the choice to use > systemd, and it is getting excellent upstream support for a growing number > of packages. I'm assuming there should have been some space here or something to make it clear that what follows is *not* from the wiki. > Yet it is very clear to all Debian users that Debian is unique, unlike > any of those above, especially when it comes to Debian Policy and its > goal. And Debian did not have to make any decision based on other > distro's decision. Debian rules! Furthermore, `excellent upstream > support' is highly unlikely or at least pretty controversial among > Debian users and devs, unless `support' is defined as compelling > "freedom" by a few propagandists. > > https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem/systemd#Why_Debian_should_default_to_systemd > > Please let there be another vote! If you mean by users it would be meaningless and repeating the TC vote would make Debian's constitution a farce. A General Resolution has been proposed and didn't even gather enough sponsors (5 required out of about 1000 Debian Members). This isn't doing any good to anyone. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic http://nuvreauspam.ro/gpg-transition.txt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
