On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:19:50 +0100 Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 September 2014 14:53:15 Joe wrote: > > As Lisi and others have pointed out, the > > design of systemd and the decision of Debian to make systemd the > > 'default', or in practice the only init system, are set in stone. > > There's nothing to discuss. > > I have never said anything of the kind. Not in so many words. > I have said only that it is > up to the developers to decide what they do. They are volunteers. Which in practice comes to the same thing. And of course that is correct, I'm agreeing with you. And I said 'and others', who have been more forthright, including some outside this list. As I said to John, I've been doing some reading. > > If someone wants to maintain or develop something else, then > obviously they can. There is no stone about it. But DO something > constructive. Maintain sysvinit. That's not going to help. It is clear that sysvinit is dead, it just hasn't stopped twitching yet. But it has no future. > Write patches for the applications > that depend on systend so that they do not depend on systemd. Etc. I don't believe that can be done in practice, and if it could, it's beyond my abilities and resources. > But stop winging. Stop taking over this list with endless useless > complaints. You don't have to read them, I dare say your newsreader can display subject lines. But if you did read them, you will see people looking for answers, not just complaining. There is no point in complaining. > > And listen to what anyone else is saying. You want to be heard. > Hear others. That's the whole point. This is where the Debian users are, this is where they can be heard. -- Joe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140923162848.2af74...@jresid.jretrading.com
