On Wed 03 Sep 2014 at 07:54:25 +0200, Erwan David wrote: > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:14:52PM CEST, Martin Read <zen75...@zen.co.uk> > said: > > On 02/09/14 19:55, Jimmy Johnson wrote: > > >Erwan David wrote: > > > > > >>aptitude remove systemd -> downgrade almost everything to stable... > > >>Ok no program present in stable should depend on systemd... > > >> > > >>that's a lot of bugs to open... > > > > > > > > >Erwan, the whole of my Wheezy desktop system as I know it seems to be > > >locked into 'libsystemd-login0' and imposable to remove, somebody > > >correct me if I'm wrong..please! > > > > The libsystemd-login0 package is required because some major components are > > built with support for systemd functionality, which they obtain by linking > > against the libsystemd-login shared library. Programs which are linked > > against a given shared library require that shared library to be present in > > order to run. > > > > *Supporting* systemd functionality is, of course, not the same thing as > > *requiring* that functionality to be present. > > lauching systemd-logind (which they do) is actually requiring it, no ? > > (samething that all those softs which start gconf daemon) > > Did someone try to *remove* pam-systemd from their configuration ? > (after all if I do not use the feature, I should be able to configure the > system for not using it).
An informed and high-quality technical post from Martin Read followed by a few bucketfuls of misleading nonsense drawn from the well of advocacy ignorance. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140903110754.gj4...@copernicus.demon.co.uk
