AW <debian.list.trac...@1024bits.com> writes: > I'm on the FOSS side. However, systemd is much better than sysvinit.
In which way is systemd better than sysvinit? Is it more modular than sysvinit? Does it require less memory? These are some points mentioned in one of the documents you're referring to[1]. Is it easier to use? Does it have better documentation? Does it attempt to confine itself to its purpose? Is it more reliable? More logical? More useful? Or what? [1]: https://people.debian.org/~hmh/debconf2/debconf2-initscripts-bkg.pdf -- Knowledge is volatile and fluid. Software is power. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87lhq7cgcm....@yun.yagibdah.de
