On Thu 07 Aug 2014 at 16:53:10 +0300, David Baron wrote: > On Thursday 07 August 2014 14:21:45 Brian wrote: > > > > This is part of the transition to systemd plan. > > > > https://lists.debian.org/87mwc9gfsw....@xoog.err.no > > > > Also, for those who care, libpam-systemd's Depends: line now has > > > > systemd-sysv | systemd-shim > > Should the dsf-53.3 versions be installed or does it matter? > systemd-shim is NOT installed (had installed on previous 32 bit system as I > said). Or are these obsolete, being handled by systemd-sysv so can/should be > removed or does it matter?
The transition hasn't been completed yet, I'd install and hold off any tidying until it has been and you remain a happy camper. The neat fallback SysV init binary feature of sysvinit might be something you want to keep. > Wish there were not so many bugs around systemd. No objection to it as long > as > it works. The number of bugs on https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=systemd;dist=unstable doesn't seen that high for a package of its importance and visibility. Most reports have had a response. Some reports are not bugs. If you value a low blood pressure don't look at the bug page for apt. :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140807150540.gx19...@copernicus.demon.co.uk
