On 4/08/2014 4:19 AM, Bzzzz wrote: > On Mon, 04 Aug 2014 03:45:48 +1000 > Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglas...@affinityvision.com.au> wrote: > >> Yes, but the method of encryption used (aes-xts-plain64) does NOT >> lend itself to this kind of analysis. > > Not that we know of…
Yes. > XTS doesn't seem to be a right choice: > http://sockpuppet.org/blog/2014/04/30/you-dont-want-xts/ Thanks, you keep me thinking, but I really need to be sleeping now... ;-) So do cryptsetup people understand this.... ? I'll have to look more in to this another time. Thanks again and good night. Cheers A.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
