On 7/22/14, Zenaan Harkness <z...@freedbms.net> wrote: > On 7/22/14, David Guntner <da...@guntner.com> wrote: >> Tom H grabbed a keyboard and wrote: >>> There is one >>> >>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-testing/ >>> >>> but a quick look at the its archives shows that it isn't a heavily >>> used list and that it's not a list for freaking out about systemd. >> >> Neither is this one, but that doesn't seem to stop people.... :-) > > :) > > It is the point too though, and I think a point made very well. > And I think it would be perfectly effective. eg: > > - This *is* debian 'testing' list - if you're not up to testing, or it > gets too hot around here, please, go back to stable. > > - This *is* debian 'unstable' list - what is your expectation of > transitioning new software into debian 'testing'? > > - This *is* debian stable list - what are you doing complaining about > debian testing/ unstable? > > _That_ has got to be about the perfect response to certain <ahem> > "complaints" shall we call them :) > > It would require a concensus to 'activate' the debian-testing list. Is > there a debian-unstable - or perhaps that should just be part of > debian-testing? > > Or is it all too much, too many lists? > > The idea seems quite appealing to me.
Since debian-testing is for devs, perhaps debian-users-notstable@? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAOsGNSSm1DLeYKRNUQejMsgO=i4F-Aih9XcVpd=8_nv_-ij...@mail.gmail.com
