On 7/22/14, David Guntner <da...@guntner.com> wrote: > Tom H grabbed a keyboard and wrote: >> There is one >> >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-testing/ >> >> but a quick look at the its archives shows that it isn't a heavily >> used list and that it's not a list for freaking out about systemd. > > Neither is this one, but that doesn't seem to stop people.... :-)
:) It is the point too though, and I think a point made very well. And I think it would be perfectly effective. eg: - This *is* debian 'testing' list - if you're not up to testing, or it gets too hot around here, please, go back to stable. - This *is* debian 'unstable' list - what is your expectation of transitioning new software into debian 'testing'? - This *is* debian stable list - what are you doing complaining about debian testing/ unstable? _That_ has got to be about the perfect response to certain <ahem> "complaints" shall we call them :) It would require a concensus to 'activate' the debian-testing list. Is there a debian-unstable - or perhaps that should just be part of debian-testing? Or is it all too much, too many lists? The idea seems quite appealing to me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAOsGNSRykN3f4AGu464i8RK9Z17gWVtS1WW33T_D07ZMdwO0=a...@mail.gmail.com
