On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:12:37AM CEST, Zenaan Harkness <z...@freedbms.net> said: > On 7/22/14, Erwan David <er...@rail.eu.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:19:54PM CEST, Andrei POPESCU > > <andreimpope...@gmail.com> said: > >> On Lu, 21 iul 14, 21:54:48, Erwan David wrote: > >> > Le 21/07/2014 21:33, Joe a écrit : > >> > > Let us hope so. Tonight's upgrade to sid requires the removal of > >> > > sysvinit-core... > >> > > > >> > > >> > libpam-systemd 204 depends systemd-sysv|systemd-shim > >> > libpam-systemd 208 depends systemd-sysv > >> > > >> > Alternative disappeared (and systemd-sysv conflicts sysvinit-core) > >> > > >> > But thta's in testing... > >> > >> You might want to wait a little longer: > >> https://lists.debian.org/87mwc9gfsw....@xoog.err.no > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> Andrie > > > > I know. I would be more trustful if there was a dependency in the form > > systemd-sysv | systemd-shim (> 6.3) rather than the plain disapearance > > of systemd-dhim, which means that not onbly must we wait for the new > > systemd-shim to appear, but also for a new libpam-systemd package to > > appear. > > > > And I have big doubts about the fact that systemd developpers will > > produce a new package with only difference a changed depends clause. > > Just as well you don't have time to test 'testing', otherwise we might > think you were wanting to use 'testing' in production :)
I test parts of it, I but I cannot test all of it and especially NOT the base system. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140722083710.gq18...@rail.eu.org
