Ahoj, Dňa Sat, 12 Jul 2014 23:55:38 -0700 Noah Meyerhans <no...@debian.org> napísal:
> 3. Secure boot. This is a bit weird, because nobody but Microsoft is > apparently interested in investing the resources into the > infrastructure to manage the PKI associated with this. Interestingly, > Microsoft is apparently happy to sign code for free operating > systems, but most of us don't bother and simply require that our > users disable secure boot. I see these situations: 1, average home user - never boot something else, than originally (OEM) installed OS, then the secure boot don't bother them 2, experienced users (and Linux's users) often (more or less) boot another OS (e.g. custom compiled kernels, system rescue, etc) and then the secure boot bother them 3, corporate users - here is often asked to prevent boot something other than official OS (security?, support?, etc), then secure boot is appreciated By this, i see, that the secure boot is good for corporate environment, don't affect average home users. For others there is more simple to disable it, than always sign any experiment ;) regards -- Slavko http://slavino.sk
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
