On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:16:07PM -0400, Gary Dale wrote: > I disagree again. The presence of DRM material is an affront to the > open nature of the web. Mozilla's decision to cave in to the DRM > crowd doesn't need to be echoed by Debian. DRM isn't a user's > choice. It's the choice of the site owners. Groups like Debian > should be backing the FSF on this by refusing to endorse web content > restrictions. >
I guess this is going to be a debated topic. Having seen this [1], I do not think there is any way to implement meaningful (for the companies) CDMs without having them in non-free. [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-media/raw-file/tip/encrypted-media/encrypted-media.html#introduction -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140515163054.ga12...@x60s.casa
