hello I'm sorry, I didn't want to break any thread and yes I did that you Brad wrote. Clicked the answer for all, delete the buddies and wrote a new subject.
Next time I'll open a new thread. Balint On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 20:56 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 14:43:31 -0500 > "c. marlow" <ch...@marlows.org> wrote: > > Hello c., > > >I was just curious why that question would not be allowed into the > >group? Isnt this group for Debian users that are using plain debian > >and not a directive as in Ubuntu, mint? > > It's not that the message isn't allowed, but the way you created it > that's the problem. What you did when viewing a message was hit reply > to a message, delete all its contents and change the subject. That does > not create a new thread(1), since it retains all reference and in reply > to headers. As such, your new topic appears in an unrelated thread. > This muddies the waters for those following that thread. Second, those > not following that thread will never see your post. This means you cut > your chances of getting a helpful response. > > (1) Some software (most notably that from a large multi-national > corporation) will give the appearance of doing so because it ignores > those reference and in-reply-to headers for threading purposes. That > same software will still transport said headers though. >
