On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:14:59AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 03:54:38PM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 09:18:00AM -0400, Brad Alexander wrote: > > > I don't believe that Wheezy was vulnerable to Heartbleed. It was only the > > > 1.0.1f (committed 31 Dec 2011) that incorporated the vulnerable heartbeat > > > feature. My wheezy box has 1.0.1e: > > > [...] > > > So you shouldn't have anything to worry about. > > > > This is not accurate, OpenSSL 1.0.1 through 1.0.1f (inclusive) are > > vulnerable. Please see > > https://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-2896 > > Which says: > > For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been > fixed in version 1.0.1e-2+deb7u5. > > and then later this was upgraded to 1.0.1e-2+deb7u6. > > Looking at the 1.0.1e is not sufficient.
True, this is <https://www.debian.org/security/faq#version>. I think the link to the DSA explains which Debian version is not vulnerable anymore, contrary to the general statement. Cheers, Flo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140411074804.gi7...@fernst.no-ip.org
