On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 at 18:12 GMT, Mark Ferlatte penned: > > Well, if you're going to run spamassassin instead of spamd, then it's > proba= bly a good idea; it will prevent more than one copy of SA > running at a time, wh= ich will keep it from crushing your mailserver. > > SA is _really_ slow and resource intensive when run standalone; I'd > highly recommend setting up spamd and spamc instead, and then not > worry about the lock. >
Actually, I *am* running spamd/c ... so it sounds like the lock file is unnecessary? In other words, it sounds like, SA/spamc *do* handle file locking; the procmail lock is just suggested to keep system load down? -- monique PLEASE don't CC me. Please. Pretty please with sugar on top. Whatever it takes, just don't CC me! I'm already subscribed!! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
