On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Joel Rees <joel.r...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum <bg271...@yahoo.com
> > wrote:
>
>> What Debian font packages provide emojis?
>
>
> 絵文字?
>

Come to think of it, have you looked at the emoji page on wikipedia?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emoji

At least, thats what i think they are. Ive seen messages with little
>> rectangular boxes with "01f 44d" and "01f 1e7" in them, and some googling
>> suggests these are thumbs-up signs and things like that. How doe i get
>> these to display?
>>
>
> If you are talking about the Japanese e-moji, well, frankly, I've been
> tending to ignore them as substitute for the constructed emoticons like 8-*.
>
> (Also how do i look these up? Literally. I google and get a bunch of
>> random things, without very much work. If I know its some kind of font,
>> what do i type? "01f 1e7 codepoint" or "01f 1e7 unicode" don't work.)
>>
>
> You might want to ask on the Japanese user list. If my brain kicks into
> gear, I may recall where they are defined and who has charge of them,
> beyond that they are mostly proprietary extensions of the JIS character
> space. It does seem like I recently read that some of them have been
> brought into the unicode set, so you might want to nose around in
> unicode.org's pages.
>

And, in fact, the wikipedia page I pointed at above has links to the ones
that have been adopted into the Unicode standard.


> But, of course, not all those rectangular character substitutions are
> going to be e-moji. In fact, hardly any of them are, statistically
> speaking.
>



-- 
Joel Rees

Be careful where you see conspiracy.
Look first in your own heart.

Reply via email to