On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:08:22 -0600, yaro wrote: Yeah, well, all this bitching proves i should look harder for the off- topic list.
> On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 04:53:15 PM Jarth Berilcosm wrote: >> On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:29:01 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> >> I'm using a news-reader and could not find the off-topic mailinglist. >> >> Sorry to say so but your reply sounds more like rambling than anything. >> I'll reply to the part i was able to comprehend. >> >> Expectations ? Man, get a good night sleep. >> >> Computers are cheap crap because they can be made to be cheap crap. The >> production proces permits this. >> >> >> Most importantly this list is not an opinion. Almost every listed >> >> point has links to appropriate articles, threads and discussions >> >> centered on it, proving that I haven't pulled it out of my < >> >> expletive >> >> >> >> >. And please always check your "facts". >> >> >> >> If you get an impression that Linux sucks - you are largely wrong. >> >> If I had to create a list of Windows problems, it would be almost as >> >> long as this one. >> > >> > - >> > http://linuxfonts.narod.ru/ >> >> why.linux.is.not.ready.for.the.desktop.current.html >> >> > Unworldly! >> > >> > A lot of people think like you, not understanding that digital >> > technology can't compare to analog technology. Sure, using a computer >> > humans can do some things that can't be done manually or by analog >> > technology, but most things are from much higher quality, when done >> > with analog technology or manually. Multimedia, toolmaking, ... an >> > endless list. >> > >> > We use computers, because analog technology and handcrafted things >> > are to expensive, the complete philosophy of human kind did go a step >> > in the wrong direction. >> > >> > I'm pro computers, already using Linux for more than 10 years, but >> > started much earlier with computers in the late 80s. >> > >> > It's a misunderstanding to guess that computer technology is that >> > progressed. Computers are cheap crap. If you are aware that they are >> > nothing but cheap crap, you can use them from an relatively objective >> > point of view. >> > >> > Less expectations = less disappointment >> > >> > High expectations = high disappointment >> > >> > IOW your opinion is subjective from an unworldly point of view. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Ralf >> > >> > PS: You sent to the wrong list. I only Cc'ed to Debian user and sent >> > to the off-topic list. I suspect replies should go to this list only. > > > These "reasons why Linux is not ready for the desktop" lists are so > stupid. Sure they're "objective." But you know how easy it is to take > Windows or OS X, > grab a list of THEIR flaws, and call them reasons *they* aren't ready > for the desktop? This is practically trolling. Nothing to see here > people, move along. > > Conrad -- jabadaba doooh ooh ooooh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2014.01.15.21.42...@yahoo.com
