On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 22:24:11 -0400 Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 04:22, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > > > > Not to start a flame war, but I don't think XEmacs is more > > > graphical than Emacs21 (Emacs20, yes, but not Emacs21). > > > > I don't think I have used emacs21 but I don't remeber, so I can't > > tell. I also don't know how their gui comapare. > > Do you know the differences (main ones)? As far as I can tell, the most visible difference is that Xemacs seems to do a better job with handling fonts. To be more specific, Xemacs has more beautiful fonts and lets you change default font size. But Emacs is also good, and of course has the advantage of working on the command line as well as in X. There's no reason why you can't install both, since the commands are almost identical. regards, Robert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
