On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 18:28 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sun, 2013-12-08 at 04:33 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 09:03:33PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > On Fr, 2013-12-06 at 15:20 -0200, André Nunes Batista wrote: > > > > Panel 0 and Panel 1 were such an cool way to teach gui users to count. > > > > > > The saner style is to call the first panel "panel one" instead of "panel > > > zero". To name it "panel zero" even won't teach anything about logical > > > issues about indexation. > > > > ? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indexation
For good technical reasons we've got MIDI channel 0 to F (hex), 0 to 15 (decimal) when programming. The sane usage for GUIs is to call the MIDI channels 1 to 16. It's a PITA if coders mix for one and the same program the output for the GUI and call the MIDI channels sometimes 0 to 15 and sometimes 1 to 16 or they use for one and the same value range 0 to 127 and 1 to 128. This could slow down the work-flow and t#s not the fault of a user but a mistake of the coders. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1386439656.2811.79.camel@archlinux
