On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:00 PM, François Patte <francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr> wrote: > Le 06/11/2013 21:27, Tom H a écrit : >> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:36 PM, François Patte >> <francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr> wrote: >>> Le 06/11/2013 15:29, Tom H a écrit : >>>> >>>> lsinitramfs /boot/initrd... | grep ... >>> >>> sbin/mdadm >>> conf/mdadm >>> etc/mdadm >>> etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf >>> scripts/local-top/mdadm >> >> I would've grepped for "rules" too since the problem might be that the >> "/dev/md/X" symlinks aren't being created by udev in the initramfs. I >> don't understand how the other symlinks generated by the same udev >> rule are being created if these aren't... > > 63-md-raid-arrays.rules: > > ENV{DEVTYPE}=="disk", ENV{MD_DEVNAME}=="?*", SYMLINK+="md/$env{MD_DEVNAME}"
AIUI this is the rule that should create "/dev/md/X". Why it isn't being triggered when the other rules in 63-... are being triggered is a mystery. WAG: Is "MD_DEVNAME" output when you run "udevadm info -q all -n /dev/mdX"? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=sw1gzm2ojk+ok92e7n+tkwr4uvgvdolxn1wxtqt1ym...@mail.gmail.com