On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:00 PM, François Patte
<francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr> wrote:
> Le 06/11/2013 21:27, Tom H a écrit :
>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:36 PM, François Patte
>> <francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr> wrote:
>>> Le 06/11/2013 15:29, Tom H a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> lsinitramfs /boot/initrd... | grep ...
>>>
>>> sbin/mdadm
>>> conf/mdadm
>>> etc/mdadm
>>> etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf
>>> scripts/local-top/mdadm
>>
>> I would've grepped for "rules" too since the problem might be that the
>> "/dev/md/X" symlinks aren't being created by udev in the initramfs. I
>> don't understand how the other symlinks generated by the same udev
>> rule are being created if these aren't...
>
> 63-md-raid-arrays.rules:
>
> ENV{DEVTYPE}=="disk", ENV{MD_DEVNAME}=="?*", SYMLINK+="md/$env{MD_DEVNAME}"

AIUI this is the rule that should create "/dev/md/X". Why it isn't
being triggered when the other rules in 63-... are being triggered is
a mystery.

WAG: Is "MD_DEVNAME" output when you run "udevadm info -q all -n /dev/mdX"?


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=sw1gzm2ojk+ok92e7n+tkwr4uvgvdolxn1wxtqt1ym...@mail.gmail.com

Reply via email to