On Sun, 3 Nov 2013 14:21:40 +0000 Jonathan Dowland <j...@debian.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 02:06:06AM +0400, Reco wrote: > > Linux is way ahead of AIX, FreeBSD and HP-UX in this regard even if > > using good ol' sysvinit. So, Lennart fixed what wasn't broken in the > > first place. > > If that were so, why are people adopting it? I don't know why people adopting it. I only have an option about why distributions adapting systemd. IMO: Fedora - because RedHat needs something enterprisey for their RHEL, and apparently upstart in RHEL6 doesn't cut it (being pet Canonical project and all that). OpenSUSE - because Novell (assuming, of course, there's anybody left to make decisions after their sellover) needs something enterprisey for SLES, and their homegrown sysvinit doesn't cut it for some reason. ArchLinux - because they like to ship upstream projects unmodified and like to change things frequently. They ship GNOME - GNOME says 'use systemd' - they ship systemd. Did I miss some more-or-less important distribution that already moved to systemd? PS Not that I have anything against systemd. By the time I'll get my hands on it (be it next Debian stable, or RHEL7) they'll sure stabilize it somehow, write distribution-specific documentation and all that. Reco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131103204113.8b66aaf8740e7fc6127cc...@gmail.com
