On 10/25/13, Gregory Nowak <g...@gregn.net> wrote: > This is an update to the thread originally started at: > <http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2013/08/msg00718.html> > > To recap briefly though, I ended up using NAT to route a public > address from my /29 subnet on my VPS to a private IP address > assigned to my client by openvpn on the VPS. ... > This worked well. However, the proxy arp discussion in the latter part > of this thread stayed with me, and I wanted my gnu/linux clients to > actually get a public address directly from my /29 on their tap > interface without doing NAT. Bob Proulx indicated this was possible, ... > The bottom line is that I have my > VPS doing proxy arp for my openvpn clients, so my clients get a public > address assigned directly without the need for doing NAT.
Great! Thank you so much for sharing this, Zenaan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caosgnssns0nt_burrnfvwv1feavdbd_zye_0mt1jp5sphjn...@mail.gmail.com
