Gregory Nowak wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 06:26:38PM +0200, Veljko wrote:
IIUIC, this is output I should be looking:
sda:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED
WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 095 094 006 Pre-fail Always
- 230210521
5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 096 096 036 Pre-fail Always
- 5832
sdb:
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 119 082 006 Pre-fail Always
- 234455192
5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 099 099 036 Pre-fail Always
- 2320
sdc:
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 115 099 006 Pre-fail Always
- 87852008
5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 036 Pre-fail Always
- 0
sdd:
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 118 099 006 Pre-fail Always
- 187317944
5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 036 Pre-fail Always
- 0
Acording to this, all drives are bad, but only sda behaves badly. Three more
values are reported as Pre-fail: Spin_Up_Time, Seek_Error_Rate and
Spin_Retry_Count. Full output for sda:
According to the above, I would say only sda and sdb are bad, sda
being the worst of the two. I stand to be corrected as always.
Yeah - that's what it looks like to me as well (having gotten back to a
screen other than my smartphone).
It also looks like those drives are pretty old:
40 Head_Flying_Hours 0x0000 100 253 000 Old_age Offline -
174414326932768
241 Total_LBAs_Written 0x0000 100 253 000 Old_age Offline
- 23166370191361
242 Total_LBAs_Read 0x0000 100 253 000 Old_age Offline
- 174661697951516
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5261bb23.90...@meetinghouse.net
