Tom H <tomh0...@gmail.com> writes: >>> Have you filed a bug report about aptitude breaking apt (whatever >>> that means!) or is this just FUD? >> >> No, I have not. Because it is normal aptitude's behaviour. >> >> It was a cognitive case... > > You start out by replying that this isn't a bug but normal for > aptitude!
Yes, it's normal for aptitude, but isn't it ugliness? > And I agree. > > Aptitude gives you the option to to install a piece of software > without a hard dependency (and then dealing with the consequences) or > of overriding a previous choice of software installation. > > It gives you a choice! It doesn't install packages that breaks your > installation or conflicts with your requirements without your consent! Great. It gives me a choice to break my system, and the only thing that separates me from it is the letter 'y'. Thanks. I do not like this choice. I would prefer not to have it. > Not only is aptitude not broken but it doesn't break apt since you can > still use apt-get/aptitude to install other packages. Did you read carefully. or your aim is to start a new holywar?
pgp0X0mZTG7ly.pgp
Description: PGP signature
