> >> MATE from upstream does conflict with other software. This isn't good,
> >> it's the most worse I can imagine and likely the reason that distros
> >> aren't interested to add it to official repositories. MATE is the only
> >> software I know available for Linux, that does conflict with common
> >> software.
> > I use MATE and I have not experience any conflicts. Do you have any
> > examples of programs that don't work when MATE is installed?
> > I am on Sid, if that helps.
> >
> There's an entire subculture on Debian dedicated to blind hatred of MATE
> for no reason. "Conflicts" are their chief complaint yet I've never once
> seen MATE bashers actually demonstrate any real, reproducible conflict.
> I've used it on Stable, Testing, and Unstable all with zero conflicts
> whatsoever.

There were naming conflicts early on with Gnome 3.  Those are gone.  There are 
two packages that still conflict: mate-desktop-gnome and mate-dialogs-gnome.  

The dialogs from Gnome 3 (zenity) serves, so mate-dialogs-gnome isn't needed if 
zenity is installed (and mate-dialogs-gnome can serve in place for zenity as 
well).

mate-desktop-gnome conflicts with gnome-desktop-data.  They did a rename trick 
with this, and another package, mate-desktop, serves the same purpose, I 
believe, and it doesn't conflict. 

I think.  

Mark

   


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/002f01cec69f$bfc7b8c0$3f572a40$@allums.com

Reply via email to