On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 21:16 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > On 8/27/13, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net> wrote: > > You're free to consider the distros you mentioned as the best distros, > > but by doing this you miss a basic approach of FLOSS. There isn't such > > as a commercial competition, or radical political model. > > What you say does not make sense. > > You are free to ignore most (or all) of what I say, and to make > assumptions about things I have supposedly considered or said. > > Free to do so, but not useful...
What branch of Debian do you recommend to contribute in development of important Linux userspace projects? I explained that you can't do that, if you experience a dependency hell or an unstable environment. To contribute that way users and developers need stable up-to-date releases of software + sometimes newer releases than the current stable releases. Debian doesn't provide a stable branch that is up-to-date, in sync with stable releases from upstream, even the unstable branches of Debian don't provide this. Wouldn't you call this a drawback for the evolution of Linux, while it has less, if any advantages to go this way? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1377602998.724.82.camel@archlinux
