On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:44:28PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > Whether or not using proxy arp, I recommend using tap device. I > believe there is a little more overhead with tun (higher in the > stack), _especially_ given you want to forward everything, ie DNAT and > SNAT. tun buys nothing but overhead, compared to tap.
I've thought of doing that earlier, but didn't see the point of switching from the openvpn default, since I don't need to actually transport ethernet frames. I'll do that though, and will see if I notice any improvement. Thanks. Greg -- web site: http://www.gregn..net gpg public key: http://www.gregn..net/pubkey.asc skype: gregn1 (authorization required, add me to your contacts list first) -- Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-mana...@eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130824033749.ga6...@gregn.net
