Thanks for the feedback, Glenn.

I adapted your block for a static IP for my network:
# The primary network interface
iface eth0 inet static
        address 192.168.1.199
        netmask 255.255.255.0
        broadcast 192.168.1.255
        network 192.168.1.0
        gateway 192.168.1.1

This causes the system to take much longer to boot up, as it hangs at the
"Starting MTA" phase. Also, I'm no longer able to SSH into the system via
eth1, which is a USB ethernet adapter I use for troubleshooting. On a
semi-related note, upon attempting to plug a USB keyboard into the system,
the kernel crashes, which was not the case when I was assembling the parts
and installing the base OS. (These parts are all brand new.)

To anyone googling this, save yourself the hassle: RMA whatever hardware
you have, and order something with a different brand of NIC on board. Intel
and Broadcom seem to be more sociable.


On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Glenn English <g...@slsware.com> wrote:

>
> On Jul 7, 2013, at 10:31 PM, John McCardle wrote:
>
> > I am trying to use a realtek NIC under Linux (Debian 7.1). It is the
> onboard ethernet in my Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3.
>
> I'm sorry, I can't tell you how to make it go. But if it's any use, I can
> tell you what a known working IPv4 1000baseT/Full looks like on a Dell
> server I'm bringing up:
>
> root@server:/etc/nsd3# lspci | egrep -i ethernet
> 04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5722
> Gigabit Ethernet PCI Express
>
> root@server:/etc/nsd3# cat /etc/network/interfaces
> # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
> # and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5).
>
> # The loopback network interface
> auto lo eth0
> iface lo inet loopback
>         allow-hotplug eth0
>
> # The primary network interface
> iface eth0 inet static
>         address 192.168.2.202
>         netmask 255.255.255.0
>         broadcast 192.168.2.255
>         network 192.168.2.0
>         gateway 192.168.2.1
>         # dns-* options are implemented by the resolvconf package, if
> installed
>
> root@server:/etc/nsd3# ifconfig eth0
> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:26:b9:67:b6:ac
>           inet addr:192.168.2.202  Bcast:192.168.2.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>           inet6 addr: fe80::226:b9ff:fe67:b6ac/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:7424 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:7228 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>           RX bytes:787352 (768.8 KiB)  TX bytes:2108943 (2.0 MiB)
>           Interrupt:17
>
> root@server:/etc/nsd3# ethtool eth0
> Settings for eth0:
>         Supported ports: [ TP ]
>         Supported link modes:   10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
>                                 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
>                                 1000baseT/Half 1000baseT/Full
>         Supported pause frame use: No
>         Supports auto-negotiation: Yes
>         Advertised link modes:  10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
>                                 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
>                                 1000baseT/Half 1000baseT/Full
>         Advertised pause frame use: Symmetric
>         Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
>         Speed: 1000Mb/s
>         Duplex: Full
>         Port: Twisted Pair
>         PHYAD: 1
>         Transceiver: internal
>         Auto-negotiation: on
>         MDI-X: Unknown
>         Supports Wake-on: g
>         Wake-on: d
>         Current message level: 0x000000ff (255)
>                                drv probe link timer ifdown ifup rx_err
> tx_err
>         Link detected: yes
>
> root@server:/etc/nsd3# ethtool -i eth0
> driver: tg3
> version: 3.121
> firmware-version: 5722-v3.10
> bus-info: 0000:04:00.0
> supports-statistics: yes
> supports-test: yes
> supports-eeprom-access: yes
> supports-register-dump: yes
> supports-priv-flags: no
>
>
> What's that eth1 all about in your interfaces configuration? If eth0 is
> *the* onboard ethernet, might eth1 be confusing something?
>
> --
> Glenn English
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to