Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > ..as in; "Where _is_ Osama and Saddam?". And playing the > > "west bank settler" games on the Iraqis, is _not_ gonna help. > > > > I'm beginning to see this as an issue over which rational and reasonable > people can disagree. > > For me, this all ties back into my "Illusion of Technique" philosophy. > The positive argument the anti-Bush people make is: "Iraq is a waste of > time; we must eliminate al Quaeda itself."
Saddam Hussein is/was a bad man and perhaps should have been eliminated. However, the basis for that is not the fight against terrorism. > I answer: show me your > SPECIFIC plan, don't just wave your hands and say: "We'll do it." What country is Osama bin Laden from? What country provides Al Qaida with most of its money? What country provided 15 of the 19 9-11 hijackers? I know what country is responsible. Our tanks should have rolled *south* out of Kuwait. > When you press the anti-War people on just *how* they are going to > prevent cataclysmic terrorism, they generally bash Bush and say "we'll > use police techniques to prosecute them." Sounds nice, but in > actuality, tough choices must be made. > > Maybe in 50 years the Muslims will be turning out killer cars like > Germany or killer stereos like Japan. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Johan KULLSTAM -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
