On Tue 11 Jun 2013 at 18:54:43 +0100, Joe wrote: > Agreed, I was echoing Chris' assertion that 'lazy' is not automatically > 'bad'. 'Idle' is probably closer to describing non-Googlers than 'lazy'.
We could now have a discussion on the subtle difference in meaning and usage between the Old English 'idle' and the 'lazy'. We could also throw the Latin 'indolent' into the mix. If anyone mentions 'sloth' we can expand into a detailed analysis of the Seven Deadly Sins. :) Apart from that, respect for a user and their concerns is sometimes shown by not providing any answer to a query. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130611190934.GC11739@desktop
