On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 08:39:00PM +0400, recovery...@gmail.com wrote: > On Thu, 30 May 2013 01:32:27 +1200 > Chris Bannister <cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz> wrote: > > > I am fairly sure that aptitude came AFTER synaptic! > > While I don't argue with that (I started using Debian when etch was > testing), on my Debian system changelogs for aptitude and synaptic clearly > show that aptitude was first, and synaptic was second: > > > aptitude (0.0.6a-1) unstable; urgency=low > > * Initial Release. > > -- Daniel Burrows <daniel_burr...@brown.edu> Sun, 6 Feb 2000 12:58:13 -0500 > > > synaptic (0.16-1) unstable; urgency=low > > * Initial Release (closes: #115167) > > -- Michael Vogt <m...@debian.org> Tue, 13 Nov 2001 23:17:20 +0100
oops. Better start eating blueberries! Although, initially IIRC, aptitude had some issues and wasn't the best to use. Synaptic came about 2 years later! Wow, I'd have lost money on that one! :) -- "If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing." --- Malcolm X -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130530003536.GA14591@tal
