On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Raffaele Morelli < raffaele.more...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2013/5/15 Joel Rees <joel.r...@gmail.com> > >> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Raffaele Morelli < >> raffaele.more...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> 2013/5/15 Joel Rees <joel.r...@gmail.com> >>> >>>> (My system speaks to me in Japanese, so the messages below are my >>>> translations.) >>>> >>> >>> that's a big issue :-) >>> >> >> Nah, c'mon, my Japanese is perfect. Kanpeki-tte-yuttoru yanka. >> >> :-\ >> > > yeah, you win B-) > ... the booby prize, I suppose. The times I have had Japanese assume that, just because I have pretty good pronunciation and grammar, I can read their minds, ... > You're right. The squeeze3 kernel, etc. packages are right there in the >> cache directory. >> >> Odd. The dates are Saturday afternoon and evening. I just checked >> synaptic, and it says notify, not download. Synaptic isn't going to have a >> separate setting for download-in-background is it? >> >> But I'm pretty sure I ran apt-get update and upgrade in proper order on >> Sunday and Monday. Any idea why the install would wait until today? >> >> > Can't help you here, I do not use synaptic at all but apt-get upgrade it's > quite straightforward... have a look at you history to check what went on > with apt-get > Moreover, check your atp logs > Okay, I have a little time to check the configuration and logs before the sandman does me in tonight. conf.d/50unattended-upgrades has stable and security uncommented in the Unattended-Upgrade::Allowed-Origins section. Does that take precedence over, say, 10periodic? Or is the kernel not part of the Download-Upgradeable-Packages clause (set to "0")? And nothing shows for the kernel this month at all in history.log or term.log. But apticron did send me a mail about it, with a list of legitimate looking fixes and urgency set high, claiming dann frazier was in charge of the upgrade.l -- -- Joel Rees
