green wrote: > Lars Nooden wrote: > > alberto fuentes wrote: > > > A (me) -> Server (overseas) -> B (arbitrary computer in my city) > > > > To make a direct connection between A and B with ssh, you need to have at > > least on of them be publicly available even if the other is blocked behind > > a firewall. > > nat-traverse is something new (to me at least) that supposedly allows > a direct connection to be made between 2 systems which are *both* > behind NAT/masquerading gateways. In this case, the third publicly > accessible server would not be necessary, and traffic would not be > required to leave the local area. > > http://m19s28.dyndns.org/iblech/nat-traverse/
Since alberto said that both A and B know about Server then NAT traversal shouldn't be needed. > > Both computer A and B know about Server. If both A and B can get to Server then it is very easy to just hop through Server to get to the other. Bob
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
