On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:37:05AM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote: > One addition to Karsten's questions/issues: > It has been claimed that one person's spam is another person's ham. To > what extent is this actually true? Or is this just obfuscation by the > advocates of spam? If we had collections of ham and spam that have > been accumulated by different users with different filter set ups, we > could look for overlap and disjointness of sets. Or just run one > person's spam thru another person's filter. Lots of opportunities for > useful statistical studies.
I think insofar that spam == unsolicited commercial email; the definitions are pretty clear. -Dave -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
