> From: "Morel Bérenger" [mailto:berenger.mo...@neutralite.org] > > It would generalize the > > principle, but it's a bit like multiple inheritance in C++ vs. single > > inheritance plus multiple interfaces in Java. Multiple is nice, but it > > really is a can of worms, which Java tries to sidestep. Mostly, people > > are just going to say that you can get what you want with Remote > Desktops > > and/or X-though-ssh-type things. Which is why this rambling wreck of a > > tangential digression is mostly just crazy talk. > > For inheritance, the problem is not at the first level, but when there are > more: diamond inheritance means that resources could be duplicated, > creating strange behavior if the programmer did not made the inheritance > virtual. > On the other hand, this can often be avoided, and when you speak about > Java, just remember that this language does not even have unsigned types > :)
Yeah. Just an iffy example. Really, all I wrote about this is just a flight of fancy, nothing more. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/006501ce1138$ad431ae0$07c950a0$@allums.com
