i have heard people suggest using winbind ( i think it is a kerberos base auth ) with samba and ldap with posfix. the question is why. it seem more easier when i configure it for freeNAS and openfire XAMPP server.
My experience with samba and winbind was quite difficult however now after configuring it countless times it seems a bit easier to me now :P and both are quite stable too. but the question is, what is the big difference. why we can not use ldap auth for samba or why people do not recommend the stack of bath and vice versa. the besic idea behind using both is to use Active directory data base (in my case only) (i know ldap can be use for openldap blah blah) in this particular case i mean with active directly integration why we do not choose just one for every server base application , like samba,squid,postfix, openfire,etc . please correct me if you see any mistake with my understanding in both tools. because my question could be the result of my misunderstanding or lack of knowledge Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cagwvfmk6s1fxk0ahtdnytpcg2ve-nwkhhy_s9jr1raqsoz4...@mail.gmail.com
