On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 21:13 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 15:09 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > On Mi, 21 nov 12, 09:25:45, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > > > > > > top > > > > > > In this context > > > > > > killall -9 -w <software_name> > > > > > > is very helpful. > > > > Just stumbled across: > > > > http://partmaps.org/era/unix/award.html#uuk9letter > > > > I prefer 'killall <name>' (which sends 15 by default) > > Hard to say what's better. A newbie might be surprised if kill <name> A typo killall > won't stop something bad. > > My "start audio session scripts" start with > killall -9 -w [...], so what ever should happen, I only need to start > the script again, but I agree, if I have to manually kill something I > start with a simple killall or kill. > > Regards, > Ralf
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1353702279.11101.1.camel@q
