On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 20:01 -0400, Rob Owens wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:13:40PM +0100, Martin Smith wrote: > > A minimum refresh rate of 72Hz is recommended (same as average human > > heart rate) to > > minimize optical discomfort that you seem to be suffering. Less than > > that the screen will > > often jump about and make it difficult to see properly. See if you > > can do something about > > that. > > > I always thought that refresh rate didn't matter on LCD monitors, and > that 60Hz was recommended simply because the monitor always converted > its input to 60Hz anyway. But I don't have any hard data proving that > is true...
I'm still using tube monitors. For LCD the refreshing rate doesn't matter, because the screen will be refreshed, but without going out. For a tube monitor it's going out and refreshed, this does cause the stroboscope effect. However, some people are sensitive and even the colors could cause pain. I like to kill all the politicians of the EU, I only own 7 auxiliary reflector "small heating device", when they die, I'm forced to use energy saving lamps, degassing plastic and incomplete light spectrum with evil peaks for the spectrum will cause sickness. Btw. the durability for a reflector lamp is some month, but for a reflector energy saving lamp some hours, max some days only. YMMV! Perhaps it's for some or all LCD displays similar. The angle of vision, colors etc. all this in combination in the sum might cause problems for some people. An artist I know had no health issues using a LCD display, but even an expensive, modern LCD display doesn't show the same color, if you minimal watch it by another angle of vision and it's impossible to keep the same angle of vision. He doesn't use the LCD and use his old monitors again. New isn't always better! Regards, Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1348047153.5397.53.camel@precise
