Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > But in the future when when Debian Jessie is being released I am going > > to be reading then on the mailing list about how old and bad Linux 3.2 > > is and how it should not be used because it is too old. > > So what you're saying here is that Jessie should be released with the > 2.6.32 kernel of Squeeze because we already know how bad it is.
No. I am saying that Jessie should release with the Linux 4.1 kernel because I am sure we will all agree that a Linux 4.1 kernel would be awesome and so much better than the 3.2 kernel. > Thus the Jessie kernel won't go from "good" to "bad" causing > widespread depression and suicide amongst Debian users. Hopefully we haven't had widespread suicide amongst users. Instead perhaps more like a diabetic coma due to depression causing an increased consumption of chocolate. Massive amounts of chocolate! The true cure for depression. Isn't it depressing how a kernel goes from high praise to low disdain in only a very short time. Is the Linux kernel made from bananas? I think it might be. It seems to turn brown so very quickly. I wonder if it is mildly radioactive too? That might explain a lot. It does seem to have a half life. Bob
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
