On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 07:42:50PM +0800, lina wrote: > On Tuesday 11,September,2012 06:35 PM, Darac Marjal wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 06:25:14PM +0800, lina wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I put some files on the hosting server, those files can be viewed via > >> the explicit url, > >> > >> such as web.xxx.com/~lina/some_file.html > >> > >> There are no any link built from homepage. > >> > >> I wonder if someone else, without knowing the explicit name, whether can > >> they get or not? > >> > >> I tried wget -c web.xxx.com/~lina/* not work. > > > > Try just http://web.xxx.com/~lina/ > > > Forbidden > > You don't have permission to access /~lina/ on this server. > Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS) Server at www.xxx.edu Port 80
That's good news. > > > > > > By the way, I shan't make any judgements on your hosting provider > > looking like a porn site :) > > I gave my words, it's a very decent website. Just let me keep some > privacy. The xxx is something I used to substitute something else. > > Ah, I see. In future, I'd recommend sticking with the preferred "documentation" host example.com. That's explicitly defined as a host to be used for demonstration/documentation purposes (as are example.net, example.org and so on). If you visit http://example,com, you'll see a nice message stating that the host is for example purposes. If you visit http://www.xxx.com... I suspect the message might not be so polite :) My point is, it's fine to not use your real website, but if you use "xxx.com" it's not immediately obvious that that's a substitution. If you use "example.com", it's rather more clear what's going on. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120911141755.gc17...@darac.org.uk
