On Mon, September 10, 2012 7:06 am, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Sep 2012 14:57:20 -0700, Weaver wrote:
>
>> On Sun, September 9, 2012 7:43 am, Camaleón wrote:
>
>>> You mean you got your linux preinstalled within you computer? That
>>> would be nice but I'm afraid not the norm :-)
>>
>> No, I mean that I have always had to install/reinstall Windows, because
>> the software has usually been as broken as the secondhand boxes.
>
> Ah, sure, reinstalling Windows is a usual task for non-techies. They tend
> to fill too much their systems with crappy software but Windows is not
> the culprit here, but users. Look, we always end in users :-)

That's it!
I used to be a crappy user!

>
>>> That's a different user case. But then, Windows installation is not
>>> that straight-forward because you may have to provide some basic
>>> drivers (for the storage controller) and manually partition the hard
>>> disk, choose the file system to use, etc.
>>
>> I don't remember anything like that, but I should qualify that with the
>> info that I haven't dealt with Windows since XP, which is when I finally
>> gave up on it.
>
> The last installation I did for a Windows system it was also a Windows XP
> box and for the task I needed to create a floopy disk with the
> corresponding AHCI drivers because the installer did not recognize the
> controller and gave a nice BSOD (I wonder what a non-techie user would
> have done in this case >:-) )

Probably the hardware was too new for the operating system.
As I said, I had old crappy boxes, too.
I remember that I was running 98 SE on a couple of them, so they wouldn't
have been the latest fashion in motherboards.

Enforced obsolescence.
The Microsoft way!
>
> But yes, installing Windows completely from scratch is not an easy task.
>
>>>> From memory, it ran itself.
>>>
>>> I really doubt it.
>>
>> No, really.
>> My only recollections are of that blue screen with a loading indicator
>> running across it, which told me, after my first couple of installs,
>> that I could go and make another cup of coffee.
>
> Maybe is that you were lucky and all the hardware and devices were a bit
> old and thus properly detected by the installer itself because Windows
> attached the needed drivers. But of course, this is not always the case
> and when problem arises (in Windows, I mean), it can be very difficult to
> debug.
>
>>>> There were perhaps a couple of questions that didn't require reference
>>>> to Einstein, but that was all.
>>>
>>> Not the questions the "joe" user is able to provide without help.
>>
>> Perhaps this has come along lately, as an inducement for Joe-User to go
>> for the OEM variety, so they can cut back on their totally inefficien
>> support staff.
>
> (...)
>
> OEM versions of Windows have been always there (in fact, most of the
> notebooks/netbooks only provide the OEM version). For desktop computers
> or servers that you can build by yourself, it's easier to get an empty
> disk and then "buy" a copy of the full (non-OEMized) Windows installation
> disk (well, "buy" enclosed in quotes because a high percent of Windows
> users do not pay a cent for their OS, you know...).

I think you have to keep those ones off-line?
Regards,

Weaver.
-- 
"It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its  government."
 -- Thomas Paine



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/2e2159dac9bcff6071f2da7127a7903f.squir...@fulvetta.riseup.net

Reply via email to