On Sep 1, 2012, at 3:15 PM, John Hasler wrote: > The kernel has no interest in domain names. It deals only in IP > numbers. Dealing with DNS is the job of a resolver running in user > space.
Thanks. I didn't know that -- makes sense. But it raises a question in my mind: Who does, beside servers? Just 'hostname'? I think I came into the TCP/IP networking business a little late. Was there ever a time when there were no domains, just IPs? That could explain a lot to me about why the domain name is so hard to get to... > A machine can be in more than one domain. I don't understand that. I've got several domains' nameserver records pointed at my server, serving a number of protocols. But the server itself is in only one domain. Apache and Postfix and Bind all handle the different domains, but I think of all of them as virtual domains, not the one true domain that my server is part of. Am I thinking wrong? Or is it possible somehow for a machine to have 2 FQDNs? I've never considered that. And I can't think of how to configure things so 'hostname --fqdn' could answer with 2 strings... -- Glenn English -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/d5ee0f34-4bda-413f-bbfb-081238213...@slsware.com