On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 20:47:08 +0200, Ja wrote: > Hi,
Hi, but please, no html posts, thanks :-) > > I'm having problem with newest Bind9 (9.7.3). In version 9.6-ESV-R1 it > works fine. The problem is that wildcard records are taking priority to > more specific ones. (...) > When I ask Bind 9.6, it says: > > jajko.pl, NAME: s1.serv.pl, and this is fine! But bind 9.7.3 says > s2.serv.pl ... why and how do I fix it? How are you querying your DNS servers? Send the exact command and what's the output you get in both cases. Anyway, I would avoid using wildcards for DNS registries. Also, check this for some hints: Will a wildcard CNAME take precedence over a named CNAME record? http://serverfault.com/questions/117671/will-a-wildcard-cname-take-precedence-over-a-named-cname-record Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/k1imvi$ik9$1...@ger.gmane.org
