On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:54:09 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: >> > Why did you choose "rbind" over "bind". Just curious. >> >> The advantage of using "rbind" is that you don't have to mount >> "/dev/pts" and "/dev/shm" (or just "/dev/pts" on wheezy since >> "/dev/shm" has been moved to "/run/shm") after mounting "/dev". > > This approach is really nice, and schroot used to do this. There's just > one niggle: > > If you use systemd, it will kill your system because autofs mounts under > /dev created by systemd can't be bind mounted; well, they can, they are > just broken and umountable, and all the processes in your system will > slowly enter D state!
Interesting. What is systemd? (apt-cache search systemd shows me nothing) How can I tell if I'm using systemd or not? I ask because till now, I always use rbind for /dev under chroot, because of the above advantage. -- Tong (remove underscore(s) to reply) http://xpt.sourceforge.net/techdocs/ http://xpt.sourceforge.net/tools/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/k1hd03$nfv$3...@ger.gmane.org
