On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 04:39:46 -0700, Weaver wrote: >> On Aug 21, 2012, at 6:53 AM, Camaleón wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:37:43 -0700, Weaver wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I regularly log 40-47Kb/s on updates.. Cheers,
>> And so do we all... Rick, careful when quoting... > Yes, I understand this, Rick, but even with Cameleon's suggestion of > downloading a larger file from Oracle's servers, at a quiet time of > night, a 64 MB download (Mysql's community edition, X86_64) still takes > one minute and seven seconds. Weaver, you don't have to center your attention on the time it takes but the download speed (KiB/MiB per second). As I said, using Oracle servers I can get up to 10 MiB/s which is the best number I have ever got. > I understand also, that many can't get these speeds, but when you are > paying for 100MB/s and not even getting ADSL1 speeds, the ethic bothers > me. That's a common feeling from users with high speed links, but there is not much we can do, simply put: todays Internet is not prepared for providing that speeds but in counted sites/hosts :-( Anyway, remember that you are paying for 100 Mbps that is around 12 MiB/s. > I've worked for myself, predominantly, since the age of 17 and no client > would ever be able to say that they got short-changed by me. It's > unethical business, pure and simple. This goes against the grain. (...) Can you please provide the results of this speed test? http://www.speedtest.net/ I get: Ping: 3 ms Download: 86.09 Mbps Upload: 9.96 Mbps Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/k12qfo$6m0$5...@ger.gmane.org
