On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 19:21:25 +0100, Brian wrote: > On Wed 08 Aug 2012 at 17:45:40 +0000, Camaleón wrote:
>> > How can this be [OT]? It's about Debian. It concerns Wheezy. And the >> > installer is involved, too. >> >> I tagged as OT because the scope (chit-chat) is out of the technical >> issues expected here. And it concerns Jessie, not Wheezy (please, don't >> scare me! ;-) ) > > Be frightened; very frightened! You're right! Oh-My... >> > The decision >> >> So you think is it a firm decision? :-? > > The tasksel maintainer has made it so. Without asking to their user base nor a single survey to get some feedback before a final move like this... nothing? :-? >> > could possibly be reversed if someone could find and implement a way >> > of getting the GNOME task on CD-1. >> >> I wonder what the other linux distributions are doing in this regard, >> what the GNOME teams (Debian and upstream) think about it and what >> other desktop environments can be also considered as good options to be >> used for the default. >> >> I'm afraid there are many questions over the table. > > The Debian GNOME team (or one or two of them) may not be over the moon > but none of them maintain tasksel. Upstream doesn't count. But one could expect the tasksel team asks about this change to the rest of the involved teams (e.g., boot/cd and the others in charge of the DE packages such as GNOME/KDE/XFCE/LXDE...), right? I don't mean to sound rude but this seems to be a rather quick decision with little debate over it. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/k00fnn$t9u$6...@dough.gmane.org
