Hi all, I have three machines which are updated from sid regulary and are on the same update level now (especially for the tests). All 3 machines use the same versions for all common installed packages. Especially for sudo base* etc.
Two machines run fine but one has a weird problem: starting sudo as root makes me sad: pts/3 jazz:root /home/harald # sudo sudo: can't open /etc/sudoers: Permission denied but as user I'm lucky: pts/2 jazz:harald /usr/src % sudo usage: sudo -V | -h | -L | -l | -v | -k | -K | [-H] [-P] [-S] [-b] [-p prompt] [-u username/#uid] -s | <command> no problem on the other machines. I already know that /etc/sudoers should have mode 0440: pts/3 jazz:root /home/harald # ll /etc/sudoers -r--r----- 1 root root 417 Oct 12 18:42 /etc/sudoers also lsattr gives me: pts/3 jazz:root /home/harald # lsattr /etc/sudoers ----------------- /etc/sudoers and: pts/3 jazz:root /home/harald # ll / [...] drwxr-xr-x 170 root root 8192 Oct 13 01:22 etc/ [...] if starting sudo as user from another sudo I get: pts/2 jazz:harald /usr/src % sudo sudo sudo: can't open /etc/sudoers: Permission denied which is no problem on another machine (even as root): pts/2 server:root /z/download/xnap # sudo sudo usage: sudo -V | -h | -L | -l | -v | -k | -K | [-H] [-P] [-S] [-b] [-p prompt] [-u username/#uid] -s | <command> my /etc/sudoers (for testing): pts/2 jazz:harald /usr/src % sudo cat /etc/sudoers # sudoers file. # # This file MUST be edited with the 'visudo' command as root. # # See the man page for details on how to write a sudoers file. # # Host alias specification # User alias specification # Cmnd alias specification # Defaults specification Defaults !env_editor Defaults editor=/z/bin/e-wait Defaults root_sudo # User privilege specification root ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD:ALL %sudo ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD:ALL which has the same effects when only using the last two lines. What I'm wondering about: I do not see how permission can be denied for root, but not for a user? strace gives me: pts/3 jazz:root /home/harald # strace sudo [...] stat64("/bin/zsh", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=427948, ...}) = 0 lstat64("/etc/sudoers", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0440, st_size=417, ...}) = 0 setregid32(0xffffffff, 0) = 0 setreuid32(0, 0x1) = 0 open("/etc/sudoers", O_RDONLY) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied) geteuid32() = 1 setreuid32(0, 0) = 0 write(2, "sudo: can\'t open /etc/sudoers", 29sudo: can't open /etc/sudoers) = 29 write(2, ": Permission denied", 19: Permission denied) = 19 [...] On the other systems a strace gives similar results (that means, I changed all differences in nsswitch.conf etc. to get the same strace), there are only diffences in module load addresses etc. up to the lines listed above. I have to say, that this machine was installed from a knoppix-3.3 CD, which generates a debian system with some knoppix-packages. Then I purged these packages and installed all packages I have on the other machines (not exactly, because one is a server and another is a laptop, but the base system is very similar). The laptop was installed in a similar way, but using knoppix 3.2 I tried to find differences between the /etc dirs on all three machines, but didn't find a significant one. I then made another test: I replaced the etc on the faulty machine with the /etc of the laptop, but this didn't change anything. So I'm lost in space... This machine has a few other weird behaviour which IMHO comes from the same permission problem. So wajig doesn't work like expected (sometimes) because wajig uses sudo. Until now I found no other problem not related to sudo. Despite from that I don't see any problem. Does anyone have a clue whats going on here? Where do you think I should look next? thanks in advance... Harald -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]