In the process of trying to make xmonad work I've found that startx fails whereas xdm succeeds. The logs are here. startx fails: http://carnot.yi.org/Xorg.0.log.old xdm succeeds: http://carnot.yi.org/Xorg.0.log
My summary of the differences follows. Any insights to direct further studies? Thanks, ... Peter E. =============== Beyond the time stamp, these are the differences. Xorg.0.log.old (--) using VT number 8 Xorg.0.log (++) using VT number 7 (WW) xf86OpenConsole: setpgid failed: Operation not permitted (WW) xf86OpenConsole: setsid failed: Operation not permitted =============== Xorg.0.log.old ends with (II) No input driver/identifier specified (ignoring) (II) Power Button: Close (II) UnloadModule: "evdev" (II) Power Button: Close (II) UnloadModule: "evdev" (II) C-Media USB Headphone Set : Close (II) UnloadModule: "evdev" (II) C-Media USB Audio Device : Close (II) UnloadModule: "evdev" (II) AT Translated Set 2 keyboard: Close (II) UnloadModule: "evdev" (II) ImPS/2 Generic Wheel Mouse: Close (II) UnloadModule: "evdev" Xorg.0.log ends with (II) No input driver/identifier specified (ignoring) =============== -- 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 12 Telephone 1 360 639 0202. Bcc: peter at easthope.ca http://carnot.yi.org/ "http://members.shaw.ca/peasthope/index.html#Itinerary " -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
