On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:24:36 +0800, Benimaur Gao wrote:
>
>> I bought a new Laptop a few days ago, it's an X220i, and I planned
>> to install a amd64 system on it
>> I dump a netinst iso(amd64) image to a flash disk by dd, boot and
>> try to work with it, but I found it just cannot use. :(
>
> "Cannot use" means that you already installed a full system on your
> machine?
No... sorry for my crappy English, I mean I can't use it to install system.
>
>> it's so easy to get crash after some trivial commands, such as 'tar
>> xjvf', 'rsync -av', etc. The system just hang after dumping some info, I
>> can't write them down entirely, too much content, I saw the keywords are
>> about 'SMP', 'protecting'...
>
> The information you give is a bit chaotic. Can you please explain what
> packages are installed in your system (full desktop environment, text
> based install...), run any of the mentioned commands and put here the
> output?
OK.
1. I dd the netinst iso to a flash disk & boot the machine with it.
2. I try to rsync the whole system to my new machine
by "rsync -av /* --exclude={/home/user/*,/sys/*,/dev/*,/proc/*,/mnt/*}
then the system got crash...
//if this succeed, then I can chroot into the new 'system', install
the kernel and grub, etc.
I always use this way to install OS...
>
>> Another two things I have tried:
>> 1. I boot my old X61 with the same usb, It works OK with the
>> previous deadly commands..
>> 2. I change to an i386 image, It works fine with my new X220i and
>> the same commands.
>> I hope to install the amd64 and I need your assistance! thank you!!
>
> I'm afraid more precission and detailed information is required to
> discover what can be happing here because amd64 images are as good as
> i386 so the problem has to be elsewhere :-?
there are too much dump info... I hope i can upload a picture captured
by my phone as an alternative...
errr.. do I create the bootable usb in a wrong way?? what's proper
method to do that??
unetbootin is required??
>>
>> //btw, another thing to complain :(
>> I think it's very inconvenient to work with a netinst iso that lack
>> of wpasupplicant! The WLAN and wpa/wpa2 authentication is so ubiquitous
>> nowadays, It's annoying to find a UTP cable..
>
> Wireless is available at install time but only WEP for Squeeze images
> (WPA is an option since wheezy, IIRC). Anyway, installing is the most
> delicated step, nothing I would rely to a wireless data layer :-)
>
> Greetings,
>
> --
> Camaleón
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jtun3d$83b$9...@dough.gmane.org
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAHAMYh3++jNjoQ8esxUm7RfD8nc_mnJf=j3fohzdb_gg8rg...@mail.gmail.com
