2012/6/27 Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> wrote: >> # uname -a >> Linux firewall-slave 3.2.12 #1 SMP Wed Mar 21 17:33:10 CET 2012 x86_64 >> GNU/Linux > > Self-compiled kernel with a firmware from backports?
Yes, not a smart decision? >> In short: do I need another host-based firmware image after flashing new >> firmware from HP? I have checked logs but I cannot find any entries >> about flash version, only info about host based firmware: > How a bout a mass search? > > grep -i firmware /var/log/*" nothing only host based firmware entries > The only problem I see here for using the provided package is that you're > not using a rpm, other than that it should be fine. > Anyway, have you considered in requesting a firmware update to the BPO guys? what is not clear to me is if I need to update both flash based and host based firmware Or maybe I just need to update host based and don't touch flash at all? Looking at debian wiki: "Many devices require a firmware to operate. Historically, firmware were built-into the device's ROM or Flash memory, but more and more often, the firmware has to be loaded into the device by the driver during the device initialization" Thanks for your help -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOy6k=tieagsdfojl6nqpohpqc-_0bjj3hnmert_zj0n-wu...@mail.gmail.com
